Female Trouble and Chicago: Fame, Fortune, and Death
Female Trouble,
the John Waters film created in 1974, features the character Dawn Davenport
committing several crimes and desiring the spotlight. At a certain point in her
life, she even uses those criminal acts as leverage to earn her spotlight.
While watching this movie, it made me think back to a movie with a similar
presence: Rob Marshall’s Chicago. Why is it that the antics of Roxie
Hart and Velma Kelly don’t cause us to cringe and turn up or noses while the
story of Dawn Davenport does?
If you haven’t
seen Chicago, here’s a brief summary. Roxie cheats on her husband Amos
with a man named Fred who promises to make her a star in exchange. When Fred
changes his mind, Roxie shoots him and finds herself on death row with Velma.
Roxie learns that by manipulating the press and public into seeing her as an
innocent woman (with the help of a famous yet fishy lawyer Billy Flynn) she
can escape her death sentence. Roxie and Velma compete throughout the film for
Billy’s attention in order to get out of jail.
So what does all this
have to do with Female Trouble? Well, in both instances, they have
independent women who involve themselves in crime and fame. However, even
though all three ladies use their criminal actions in order to gain fame and
fortune, Roxie and Velma rely on that fame to escape punishment. Dawn goes
virtually unpunished (and is often encouraged) until she dies in the electric
chair. Perhaps this is one reason that we find ourselves rooting for Roxie and
Velma over Dawn. In fact, the women on Murderess Row sing a song (Cell Block
Tango) about how their husbands/lovers deserved to die for various reasons,
while Dawn only seems to kill people who annoying her or threaten her chance at
fame, like her daughter Taffy. One of the reasons she does give when she offers
to shoot an audience member for “the sake of art” is very superfluous and not
at all sympathetic
In conclusion, the
biggest difference between Female Trouble and Chicago is the
audience’s ability to empathize and reason with the girl’s criminal actions. In
the case of Roxie and Velma, their story takes place in a time period where the
concept of women’s rights was barely taking hold, and marital abuse was common place.
These women felt they had no other options, and even though it’s not something
we as the audience would do ourselves, we have sympathy for their actions. Dawn
has no such empathetic background. We see that in her childhood her parents
treated her well, but she remained a spoiled little girl. In fact, we as the
audience feel more sympathy for Taffy due to her poor upbringing and her
attempts to escape it, even though she killed her own father.
Hi, I really enjoyed your blog post. It was very interesting how you compared the two films and I definitely agree. We as viewers do seem to feel more sympathetic towards Roxie and Velma. The fact that Dawn had a better childhood and grew up to act like a spoiled brat definitely influences our opinions of her on death row. I also do personally feel more sympathy towards Taffy, her mother was crazy and she was caught in the midst of her mothers mental break down! Good job!
ReplyDelete